Educators Who Succeed with Shadow Children
Someday educators (and hopefully, communities) will look back in shame at how our schools turned its back on today’s at-risk children. A school that should offer well-prepared at-risk teachers often places freshmen faculty or burnouts into these teaching positions. Kids should be able to count on having highly trained and skilled educators with the resources necessary to provide the compensatory programs they need. The system should have the ability to launch prevention and intervention programs that at-risk youth desperately need — and need a great deal more than other children. As Jerry Conrath (teacher and author of Early Prevention) says: “None of these children asked to be placed at-risk.”
If our school system insists on re-victimizing our youth by officially neglecting them, what message does this send to our children? Today’s youth need champions more than ever, and educators are in the perfect position to fill that role — but they need the resources and professional development to do so. Most teachers, myself included, were trained to teach math, or science, or history; we were not trained to teach children — and we were certainly unprepared to teach at-risk children.
Children are the best investment one can make with their tax dollars. In Chapter 2 of my book, Shadow Children — Understanding Education’s #1 Issue, we saw the costs for not addressing this problem in U.S. schools, which is the school system I am most familiar with. It comes to over $94,000,000,000 annually (or $319,000,000,000 based on the current President’s broader formula alluded to in the Preface).
And that figure does nothing but get larger each year. Indeed, in many ways, our children are undoubtedly the best investment possible. From the affectionate vantage point of our precious children to the businesslike multi-billions of dollars annual price tag, or both, it is in our best interests to provide them with the best teachers possible.
The Aspen Institute’s Commission on No Child Left Behind (2009) determined that teacher effectiveness is the key ingredient in student success. They also revealed the discovery that proper course work or degrees/certification did not necessarily make for the most effective teachers. What accurately measures effectiveness is student progress — the more students who progress under a teacher’s supervision, the more effective the teacher. Content is not king, competence is. There is currently a large question in front of public education: What IS success? What type(s) of student progress IS essential for a teacher to be known as a “good” teacher? If we cannot answer these questions we are left with standardized test scores as the only consistent measure of a teacher. And, if that is what we focus on, that creates another set of problems for education, namely if we know all children are different and we believe in diversity as a source of enrichment but only measure by standardized achievement test scores, just in general we have set ourselves up. It is impossible to standardize students! How do you measure effectiveness in teachers working with students in the non-standardized content areas?
What we focus on expands
Common sense tells us that what we focus on expands. If you want to feel tired, just keep telling yourself and all around you just how tired you really are. If you want to enlarge the negative aspects of anyone or anything, just begin and keep adding to a list of all the deficits and shortcomings you can. More will keep coming to mind. If you wish to feel truly impoverished keep talking and thinking about how broke you are and how unfortunate you are and how crappy your life is and how little you have. (Pretty soon even the national debt will look good to you.)
If we focus on standardized testing as THE measure of a “good education” it will be all we see as important and it will grow huge in our eyes, limiting our vision of all other aspects of what schools and learning can be for students. The memorable things of school are rarely the results of a standardized test. Yet there are schools right now spending two to four weeks of the school year prepping for the achievement tests and that amount of time is expanding. Yet no one agrees on what a “good education” is. What is important for a student to know? What — learned now — will serve a student’s future well? Who is the “best” teacher? Without answers to these questions, why are we spending so much time trying to standardize our students? With this focus, diversity will become our enemy. Tension and competition among teachers, administrators and schools (AND states) will mount to a fever pitch. Collaboration, creativity, team-teaching, and flexibility will become concepts to be avoided.
Focusing on teaching
NAREN research shows that what makes for effectiveness in at-risk education comes in two categories that we liberally and deliberately dramatically label Angel Educators and/or Warrior Educators. Both categories of educators have several things in common. They prize learning and student progress. They see education as having the power to change life for the better and they see themselves as having high self-efficacy as instruments of betterment for kids. These and a few other commonalities are internal attributes, and usually invisible. What is amazing is how the external attributes of these educators can appear to mirror the opposite of who they really are. It is the visible means by which these educators relate to at-risk learners, in particular, that is noticeably dramatic. Most highly successful at-risk educators are either Angel Educators or Warrior Educators. These labels have nothing to do with religion or with violence. Rather, they help to understand, underline, define, and explain.
The quotes below are from surveys of over 90 at-risk students in alternative programs, and 110-plus current teachers who were formerly at-risk students.
Angel educators are teachers who, despite being quiet, low key, and studious, are remarkably successful with at-risk students .
Warrior Educators may appear loud and gruff, but they have hearts of gold. Warrior educators exhibit their life on their sleeves. They often have troubled backgrounds and have learned from the school of hard knocks. Now they want to help at-risk kids get the break perhaps they never had. They want to be the teacher they never had, but so desperately needed. Perhaps they are teaching — although they act more like a professional wrestler — because they were inspired by a teacher or person who changed their life. But beneath the bark is a caring, loving person dedicated to at-risk youth.
Does this mean that only clearly defined Angels or Warriors can be successful with at-risk children? Of course not! Many educators are a combination of the two. What I have attempted to do here is make it clear what works, and show that great teachers can be quite different in their effectiveness and approaches to learning and students. On the other hand, a very successful educator once said to me, “The ‘secret’ to a great program is not what you teach but WHO teaches it.” When I asked him to clarify he said, “Real learning is about relationships — with either the content alone or with a teacher who inspires you to be all you can be. A good teacher makes learning enjoyable or meaningful, but a Great Teacher makes learning seem essential as well.”
Mentioned in this chapter are some factors common to successful at-risk educators. Every effective teacher usually also possesses a sense of humor and great enthusiasm for the academic content or learning processes. Humor and enthusiasm appear as significant labels applied to most educators who are seen as exceptional by their former students. Educators of at-risk children are this and more: They are Angels and Warriors who do not know the word quit. They fight failure as if it were a dragon, as it may well be. Above all else, they care deeply about their children’s futures and are not afraid to show it.
You are fortunate if you have had one of these educators in your life. There is no reason we could not attract and train more of them, but the field of education is timid it seems — unwilling to get into the character education of teachers, though it would impact the character education of students directly. We just need to think a bit and then be willing to announce these findings, and in our teacher training aim directly at the target of creating Angel and Warrior Educators with deliberate and determined enthusiasm. It can be done. I have seen it happen.
The Educational War We Are In: The Angel-Warrior At-Risk Educator Code
We literally are in a war to save many of our children. Our enemies are many. Our first goal is to gain clarity about our goals. This clarity includes knowing our enemies, the first of which is ignorance.
How Do We Arm Ourselves?
Shadow Children — Understanding Education’s #1 Issue was written to help arm educational stakeholders with the knowledge necessary to provide the avenues of liberation so desperately needed by our youth.
We at-risk educators find ourselves in a glorious war. It is directly concerned with the very issues that often make for great fiction — except this war is very real. It is about rescuing the helpless, rooting out decay, and replacing it with marvelous life enhancements. It often comes down to good triumphing over some form of evil. It is about saving lives. What could be more exciting or worthwhile than that? How many professionals get the chance to dedicate themselves to such a worthy cause?
Unfortunately, it is often a thankless job, with long unbroken stretches of solitary work. As service workers, we must often sustain ourselves but we must also make the effort and time to network with our colleagues, not only to share information that might expedite our work, but also to inspire one another with our hope, strength, and experience.
Above all, we must be courageous, intelligent, and persistent Angel-Warrior Educators.
Are you an Angel-Warrior Educator? Are you AWEsome? Do you aspire to be? Then you are at the right place! Right here, right now.